When using JSON.stringify, the output is null. However, when using document.write, the data

Question

When using JSON.stringify, the output is null. However, when using document.write, the data

I am currently working on a plugin for crawljax that involves executing some JavaScript code, similar to the following:

String result = browser.executeJavaScript(script).toString();

The script code is as follows:

function getElementPosition(id) {
var element = document.getElementById(id);
return JSON.stringify(elementpos(findPosX(element), findPosY(element)));
}

function elementpos(x, y) {
elementpos = new Object();
elementpos.x = x;
elementpos.y = y;
return elementpos;
}


return getElementPosition("foo");

While this seems to run successfully, the result always comes back as null. Strangely enough, if I print out the same data using document.write, I receive a well-formatted JSON string like this:

{"x":8, "y":24}

Could it be that I am misunderstanding something? Is there some issue when dealing with JSON strings and Java? Since I don't have much experience in JavaScript, could it be that I am not permitted to return data in this manner?

I am carrying out these tests on Google Chrome version 25.

Note: I do not believe this problem is related to Crawljax itself since another plugin (written by someone else) utilizes a script that returns a JSON string without any issues...

java javascript json google-chrome stringify

Answer 1

Answer №1

When it comes to JavaScript, steer clear of new Object();. Instead, opt for a simpler solution like the one provided below:

 return JSON.stringify({x:findPosX(element), y:findPosY(element)});

Avoid using objects created with the new Object(); syntax as they can lead to numerous unexpected issues in JavaScript.

Answer 2

When it comes to JavaScript, steer clear of new Object();. Instead, opt for a simpler solution like the one provided below:

 return JSON.stringify({x:findPosX(element), y:findPosY(element)});

Avoid using objects created with the new Object(); syntax as they can lead to numerous unexpected issues in JavaScript.

Answer 3

Answer №2

It appears that the issue does not lie with using new Object(), but I welcome any clarification from other commenters. Consider this alternative approach:

function findElementPosition(x, y) {
    var elementPosition = new Object();
    elementPosition.x = x;
    elementPosition.y = y;
    return elementPosition;
}

It's worth noting that adding "var" before "elementPosition = new Object();" is crucial. Without this variable declaration, the initial line of the universal "findElementPosition" function would simply replace itself with an "elementPosition" object. While it may work correctly the first time, subsequent executions could lead to errors as it attempts to interpret the new Object() result as a callable function.

I successfully ran the provided code and converted the output to a string without encountering any issues on Chrome 40. Changing the local variable name from "result" to something distinct from the function name could help eliminate potential confusion in this scenario.

Answer 4

It appears that the issue does not lie with using new Object(), but I welcome any clarification from other commenters. Consider this alternative approach:

function findElementPosition(x, y) {
    var elementPosition = new Object();
    elementPosition.x = x;
    elementPosition.y = y;
    return elementPosition;
}

It's worth noting that adding "var" before "elementPosition = new Object();" is crucial. Without this variable declaration, the initial line of the universal "findElementPosition" function would simply replace itself with an "elementPosition" object. While it may work correctly the first time, subsequent executions could lead to errors as it attempts to interpret the new Object() result as a callable function.

I successfully ran the provided code and converted the output to a string without encountering any issues on Chrome 40. Changing the local variable name from "result" to something distinct from the function name could help eliminate potential confusion in this scenario.

When using JSON.stringify, the output is null. However, when using document.write, the data

Answer №1

Answer №2

Similar questions

Enhancing Your Web Page: Updating Values Using Flask

React JS Calendar

Deleting a document by ObjectID in MongoDB with Node and Express without using Mongoose: A step-by-step guide

Using ng-repeat with deeply nested objects

Issues with user-generated input not properly functioning within a react form hook

Issue with setState not being triggered within axios POST request error handling block

"Step-by-step guide for incorporating a mask in the Ant Design Datepicker component in React

The callback function for the `input` component in React Native must be a function and should not be undefined. Always remember to start component names with the proper syntax

Utilizing ng For in a personalized directive to fill a selection menu

Angular deep nested router interface

Creating a peaceful web platform with React that supports several user roles

Tips for showcasing JavaScript variables on a webpage

What is the best way to load a database URL asynchronously and establish a database connection prior to the initialization of an Express

Events Unavailable for Viewing - Full Calendar - Database Error Encountered

I experienced an issue with Firestore where updating just one data field in a document caused all the other data to be wiped out and replaced with empty Strings

How can AJAX be used for form validation prior to submission?

The MDBDataTable features header sections at both the top and bottom, but the filters UI seems to be

By utilizing the HTML element ID to retrieve the input value, it is possible that the object in Typescript may be null

Guide on creating a toggle effect for a div with querySelector and addEventListener

The CSS stylesheet is not being applied to the components in Next.js