What is the best way to partially organize an array according to a specific condition?

Question

What is the best way to partially organize an array according to a specific condition?

Is there a way to partially sort an array in JavaScript based on specific conditions I choose?

Let's say we have an array:

var tab = [
    {html: 'This is a test'},
    {html: 'Locked item', locked: true},
    {html: 'Another item'},
    {html: 'Another one'}
    //and many more items...
];

In this array, the 2nd item is marked as "locked" and should remain at the same position (2nd place) after sorting:

var tab = [
    {html: 'Another item'},
    {html: 'Locked item', locked: true},
    {html: 'Another one'},
    {html: 'This is a test'},
    //and many more items...
];

This is the current code snippet that needs modification:

var tab = [
    {html: 'This is a test'},
    {html: 'Locked item', locked: true},
    {html: 'Another item'},
    {html: 'Another one'}
    //and more items...
];

tab.sort(function(a,b){
    var aVal = a.html.toLowerCase();
    var bVal = b.html.toLowerCase();
    if (aVal===bVal)
        return 0;
    else
        return aVal < bVal ? -1 : 1;

    //how can we handle locked items here?
});

//desired output:
/*var tab = [
    {html: 'Another item'},
    {html: 'Locked item', locked: true},
    {html: 'Another one'},
    {html: 'This is a test'},
    //and more items...
];*/

console.log(tab);

For reference, you can check the fiddle.

javascript arrays sorting

Answer 1

Answer №1

The issue at hand is the misuse of sort for linear sorting purposes only. Utilizing it beyond its intended functionality can lead to unreliable results, especially considering potential browser optimizations that may affect its execution.

Therefore, the solution lies in selectively applying linear sorting to specific sections of your array. The recommended approach involves extracting and storing the locked elements along with their respective indexes, performing the sort operation, and then reinserting the locked elements back into their original positions within the array.

var fixed = [], i;
for (i = tab.length; i--;) {
    if (tab[i].locked) {
        fixed.unshift({index: i, item: tab[i]});
        tab.splice(i, 1);
    }
}

tab.sort(...); // Implement your sorting logic here

for (i = 0; i < fixed.length; i++)
    tab.splice(fixed[i].index, 0, fixed[i].item);

It's important not to be confused by the utilization of a reverse for loop and the use of unshift instead of push. These choices are made to preserve the correct indexing structure.

The backward looping strategy compensates for the array modifications caused by splice, ensuring no items are skipped during the process. This method also maintains the sorting order of the fixed array based on the index property.

Keep in mind that while splice may be effective for small arrays with only a few fixed elements, it can be inefficient for larger datasets. In such cases, consider utilizing more optimized algorithms for improved performance.

Answer 2

The issue at hand is the misuse of sort for linear sorting purposes only. Utilizing it beyond its intended functionality can lead to unreliable results, especially considering potential browser optimizations that may affect its execution.

Therefore, the solution lies in selectively applying linear sorting to specific sections of your array. The recommended approach involves extracting and storing the locked elements along with their respective indexes, performing the sort operation, and then reinserting the locked elements back into their original positions within the array.

var fixed = [], i;
for (i = tab.length; i--;) {
    if (tab[i].locked) {
        fixed.unshift({index: i, item: tab[i]});
        tab.splice(i, 1);
    }
}

tab.sort(...); // Implement your sorting logic here

for (i = 0; i < fixed.length; i++)
    tab.splice(fixed[i].index, 0, fixed[i].item);

It's important not to be confused by the utilization of a reverse for loop and the use of unshift instead of push. These choices are made to preserve the correct indexing structure.

The backward looping strategy compensates for the array modifications caused by splice, ensuring no items are skipped during the process. This method also maintains the sorting order of the fixed array based on the index property.

Keep in mind that while splice may be effective for small arrays with only a few fixed elements, it can be inefficient for larger datasets. In such cases, consider utilizing more optimized algorithms for improved performance.

Answer 3

Answer №2

This method shows some promise:

tab.sort(function(a,b){
    if(a.locked || b.locked)
        return 0;
    if (a.html < b.html)
        return -1;
    if (a.html > b.html)
        return 1;
    return 0;
});

The issue lies in its inability to properly position the first item after a locked item due to constraints within the sorting algorithm utilized by sort. Despite this, it effectively sorts groups of two or more items as shown in your specific instance.

To accomplish your desired outcome, consider extracting the locked elements from the array, recording their indices in a variable, performing the sort on the remaining array, and finally reintegrating the locked elements into their original positions.

Answer 4

This method shows some promise:

tab.sort(function(a,b){
    if(a.locked || b.locked)
        return 0;
    if (a.html < b.html)
        return -1;
    if (a.html > b.html)
        return 1;
    return 0;
});

The issue lies in its inability to properly position the first item after a locked item due to constraints within the sorting algorithm utilized by sort. Despite this, it effectively sorts groups of two or more items as shown in your specific instance.

To accomplish your desired outcome, consider extracting the locked elements from the array, recording their indices in a variable, performing the sort on the remaining array, and finally reintegrating the locked elements into their original positions.

Answer 5

Answer №3

To potentially improve efficiency, one approach could involve removing all locked items from an array, storing their original positions, sorting the remaining items, and then reintroducing the locked items back into the sorted array:

var tab = [
    {html: 'This is a test'},
    {html: 'Locked item', locked: true},
    {html: 'Another item'},
    {html: 'Another one'}
    //and more items...
];

var stored = {}, newTab = [];
for(var i = 0, iLimit = tab.length; i < iLimit; i++) {
    if(tab[i].locked) {
        stored[i] = tab[i];
    } else {
        newTab.push(tab[i]);
    }
}

newTab.sort(function(a,b){
    var aVal = a.html.toLowerCase();
    var bVal = b.html.toLowerCase();
    if (aVal===bVal) {
        return 0;
    } else {
        return aVal < bVal ? -1 : 1;
    }
});

for(var indice in stored) {
    newTab.splice(indice, 0, stored[indice]);
}

console.log(newTab);

http://jsfiddle.net/qW7uH/2/

Answer 6

To potentially improve efficiency, one approach could involve removing all locked items from an array, storing their original positions, sorting the remaining items, and then reintroducing the locked items back into the sorted array:

var tab = [
    {html: 'This is a test'},
    {html: 'Locked item', locked: true},
    {html: 'Another item'},
    {html: 'Another one'}
    //and more items...
];

var stored = {}, newTab = [];
for(var i = 0, iLimit = tab.length; i < iLimit; i++) {
    if(tab[i].locked) {
        stored[i] = tab[i];
    } else {
        newTab.push(tab[i]);
    }
}

newTab.sort(function(a,b){
    var aVal = a.html.toLowerCase();
    var bVal = b.html.toLowerCase();
    if (aVal===bVal) {
        return 0;
    } else {
        return aVal < bVal ? -1 : 1;
    }
});

for(var indice in stored) {
    newTab.splice(indice, 0, stored[indice]);
}

console.log(newTab);

http://jsfiddle.net/qW7uH/2/

Answer 7

Answer №4

Another approach could be to eliminate all the locked items and store them in a separate array as shown below:

[
    { obj: ..., index: ...}, 
    { ... }
]

This method preserves the index for each object. You can then insert them back after sorting, although it may seem a bit cumbersome.

Refer to Array.prototype.filter for filtering, but keep in mind that it may not function properly in IE8 without a polyfill.

Answer 8

Another approach could be to eliminate all the locked items and store them in a separate array as shown below:

[
    { obj: ..., index: ...}, 
    { ... }
]

This method preserves the index for each object. You can then insert them back after sorting, although it may seem a bit cumbersome.

Refer to Array.prototype.filter for filtering, but keep in mind that it may not function properly in IE8 without a polyfill.

What is the best way to partially organize an array according to a specific condition?

Answer №1

Answer №2

Answer №3

Answer №4

Similar questions

The website becomes unresponsive and locks up after being on the same page for several

Starting objects before utilizing them in the useFrame() function in react-three-fiber

Unable to dynamically attach a class in Vue.js

A guide on retrieving values from programmatically created input elements in Java

Secure login verification coupled with intuitive navigation features

After implementing ajax, jQuery ceases to function

Ways to prevent a specific class from using CSS styling

Setting up nunjucks for using custom filters with express

What is the most effective method for handling extremely large Long numbers in Ajax?

Exporting JSON data as an Excel file in AngularJS, including the option to customize the fonts used for the

Can the color of text be adjusted (to either white or black) based on the background color (in any color and format)?

Specialized selection option with disabled function

Showing JSON information fetched from an AJAX request within an HTML page

Issue with Route Transition in React Router version 4 when using Styled Components

Fixing a menu hover appearance

Interrogating a multi-dimensional array using the MongoDB C# driver

Removing the gap between the clicked point and the draw point in Html5 canvas

Here are the steps to organize a Collection containing generic Pair elements

What is the best method for determining the cookie expiration time in AngularJS 1.3?

Typescript encounters ERROR TS1128: Expecting a declaration or statement