Tips for maintaining the immutability of an array containing objects in JavaScript

Question

Tips for maintaining the immutability of an array containing objects in JavaScript

In my program, I am working on creating a new array based on two arrays named "ideaList" and "endorsements", which are declared globally. To ensure the immutability of ideaList and endorsements since they are used in other parts of the codebase, I have attempted to use .map and .filter methods.

function prepareIdeaArray(){
var preFilteredIdeas=ideaList
        .filter(hasIdeaPassedControl)
        .map(obj => {obj.count = endorsements
                                 .filter(x=>x.ideaNumber===obj.ideaNumber)
                                 .reduce((sum, x)=>sum+x.count,0); 
                     obj.like = endorsements
                                 .filter(x=>x.ideaNumber===obj.ideaNumber && x.who===activeUser)
                                 .reduce((sum, x)=>sum+x.count,0)===0?false:true
                     obj.position = generatePosition(obj.status)
                     obj.description = obj.description.replace(/\n/g, '<br>')  
                     return obj;});
preFilteredIdeas.sort(compareOn.bind(null,'count',false)).sort(compareOn.bind(null,'position',true))
return preFilteredIdeas;
}

Despite my efforts to maintain immutability using .map and .filter, upon checking ideaList using console.log after executing this function, I noticed that objects within the array had their "count", "like", and "position" properties mutated.

I also tried using .map alone without success in preventing mutation.

If you have any suggestions on how to prevent ideaList from being mutated while avoiding the use of const (since ideaList is initially declared globally before being assigned data in another function), I would greatly appreciate it.

javascript arrays mutability

Answer 1

Answer №1

You are not directly altering the array itself, but rather making changes to the objects that the array contains references to. When you use .map(), it creates a duplicate of the array with references pointing to the same objects as the original. By adding properties directly to these objects, you are essentially mutating them.

To solve this issue, you should create copies of these objects and add properties to the duplicates instead. One way to achieve this is by utilizing object spread within the .map() callback function:

    .map(({ ...obj }) => {
      obj.score = ratings
                             .filter(item=>item.id===obj.id)
      ...

If your environment does not support object spread syntax, you can clone the object using Object.assign():

    .map(originalObj => {
      const obj = Object.assign({}, originalObj);
      obj.score = ratings
                             .filter(item=>item.id===obj.id)
      ...

Answer 2

You are not directly altering the array itself, but rather making changes to the objects that the array contains references to. When you use .map(), it creates a duplicate of the array with references pointing to the same objects as the original. By adding properties directly to these objects, you are essentially mutating them.

To solve this issue, you should create copies of these objects and add properties to the duplicates instead. One way to achieve this is by utilizing object spread within the .map() callback function:

    .map(({ ...obj }) => {
      obj.score = ratings
                             .filter(item=>item.id===obj.id)
      ...

If your environment does not support object spread syntax, you can clone the object using Object.assign():

    .map(originalObj => {
      const obj = Object.assign({}, originalObj);
      obj.score = ratings
                             .filter(item=>item.id===obj.id)
      ...

Answer 3

Answer №2

When using Javascript, objects are referenced. This means that when an object is created, the object variable points to a memory location that holds a specific value.

var x = {hello: 'world'}

The variable x now points to a memory location containing {hello: world}.

var y = x;

Now both variables x and y point to the same memory location. Therefore, any changes made to x will also affect y.

Within functions, even if you use Array methods that do not mutate their values, the array elements themselves (which are objects) can be modified within the functions. This results in creating a new array with the elements still pointing to the original memory locations of the objects.

var arr = [{number: 1}];     // Let's create an array

// Create another array based on the first one
var newArr = arr.map(obj => {
   obj.number = 2;
   return obj;
})

console.log(arr);   //{number: 2}

To avoid this issue, a new object can be created for the new array during the operation. This can be achieved using Object.assign or the latest spread operator.

arr = [{number: 1}];

newArr = arr.map(obj => {

    var newObj = {...obj};    // Creating a new object
    newObj.number = 2;
    return newObj;

})

console.log(arr);  // {number: 1}

Answer 4

When using Javascript, objects are referenced. This means that when an object is created, the object variable points to a memory location that holds a specific value.

var x = {hello: 'world'}

The variable x now points to a memory location containing {hello: world}.

var y = x;

Now both variables x and y point to the same memory location. Therefore, any changes made to x will also affect y.

Within functions, even if you use Array methods that do not mutate their values, the array elements themselves (which are objects) can be modified within the functions. This results in creating a new array with the elements still pointing to the original memory locations of the objects.

var arr = [{number: 1}];     // Let's create an array

// Create another array based on the first one
var newArr = arr.map(obj => {
   obj.number = 2;
   return obj;
})

console.log(arr);   //{number: 2}

To avoid this issue, a new object can be created for the new array during the operation. This can be achieved using Object.assign or the latest spread operator.

arr = [{number: 1}];

newArr = arr.map(obj => {

    var newObj = {...obj};    // Creating a new object
    newObj.number = 2;
    return newObj;

})

console.log(arr);  // {number: 1}

Answer 5

Answer №3

One way to maintain immutability is to consider your values as primitives.

1 === 2 // false
'hello' === 'world' // false

This concept can also be applied to non-primitives:

[1, 2, 3] === [1, 2, 3] // false
{ username: 'hitmands' } === { username: 'hitmands' } // false

To delve further into this idea, refer to MDN - Equality Comparisons and Sameness

How can you enforce immutability?

By always creating a new instance of the object!

For example, when updating a todo's status, instead of directly modifying it, create a new object:

const todo = { id: 'foo', status: 'pending' };

const newTodo = Object.assign({}, todo, { status: 'completed' });

todo === newTodo // false;

todo.status // 'pending'
newTodo.status // 'completed'

In your specific scenario, rather than setting obj.count = ..., utilize:

Object.assign({}, obj, { count: ... }) 
// or
({ ...obj, count: /* something */ })

There are tools available to assist with implementing the immutable pattern:

Answer 6

One way to maintain immutability is to consider your values as primitives.

1 === 2 // false
'hello' === 'world' // false

This concept can also be applied to non-primitives:

[1, 2, 3] === [1, 2, 3] // false
{ username: 'hitmands' } === { username: 'hitmands' } // false

To delve further into this idea, refer to MDN - Equality Comparisons and Sameness

How can you enforce immutability?

By always creating a new instance of the object!

For example, when updating a todo's status, instead of directly modifying it, create a new object:

const todo = { id: 'foo', status: 'pending' };

const newTodo = Object.assign({}, todo, { status: 'completed' });

todo === newTodo // false;

todo.status // 'pending'
newTodo.status // 'completed'

In your specific scenario, rather than setting obj.count = ..., utilize:

Object.assign({}, obj, { count: ... }) 
// or
({ ...obj, count: /* something */ })

There are tools available to assist with implementing the immutable pattern:

Answer 7

Answer №4

To create an immutable object, you can utilize the freeze method with the target object as a parameter.

const user = { username: "Alice", age: 30 }
Object.freeze(user)

Answer 8

To create an immutable object, you can utilize the freeze method with the target object as a parameter.

const user = { username: "Alice", age: 30 }
Object.freeze(user)

Answer 9

Answer №5

If you're looking for ways to implement immutability in JavaScript, you have a few options. One approach is to leverage the new ES6 features designed for immutable data structures. Alternatively, you can create a getter function to encapsulate your objects like this:

var myProvider = {}
function (context)
{
    function initializeMyObject()
    {
        return 5;
    }

    var myImmutableObject = initializeMyObject();

    context.getImmutableObject = function()
    {
        // Create a deep copy of your object.
        var x = myImmutableObject

        return x;
    }


}(myProvider);

var x = myProvider.getImmutableObject();

By using this technique, you can ensure that your object remains enclosed within a specific scope while still providing accessibility through a getter function.

To learn more about this coding pattern, check out this resource.

Answer 10

If you're looking for ways to implement immutability in JavaScript, you have a few options. One approach is to leverage the new ES6 features designed for immutable data structures. Alternatively, you can create a getter function to encapsulate your objects like this:

var myProvider = {}
function (context)
{
    function initializeMyObject()
    {
        return 5;
    }

    var myImmutableObject = initializeMyObject();

    context.getImmutableObject = function()
    {
        // Create a deep copy of your object.
        var x = myImmutableObject

        return x;
    }


}(myProvider);

var x = myProvider.getImmutableObject();

By using this technique, you can ensure that your object remains enclosed within a specific scope while still providing accessibility through a getter function.

To learn more about this coding pattern, check out this resource.

Answer 11

Answer №6

If you need to replicate mutable objects, a simple method is to convert them into strings and then transform them back into a fresh array. I have found this approach to be effective.

function duplicateArray(originalArray) {
    let str = JSON.stringify(originalArray);
    let newArray = JSON.parse(str);
  return newArray;
}

Answer 12

If you need to replicate mutable objects, a simple method is to convert them into strings and then transform them back into a fresh array. I have found this approach to be effective.

function duplicateArray(originalArray) {
    let str = JSON.stringify(originalArray);
    let newArray = JSON.parse(str);
  return newArray;
}

Answer 13

Answer №7

By utilizing the spread operator, you have the ability to keep the original array unchanged. In the example below, y represents an immutable array:

const y = [1,2,3,4,5];
function arrayRotation(arr, r, v) {
  for(let i = 0; i < r; i++) {
    arr = [...y]; // preserves the immutability of array y [1,2,3,4,5]
    arr.splice(i, 0, v);
    arr.pop();
    console.log(`Rotation ${i+1}`, arr);
  }
}
arrayRotation(y, 3, 5)

If the spread operator isn't used, the y array will be subject to changes with each iteration of the loop.

Below is the result for a mutable array:

const y = [1,2,3,4,5];
function arrayRotation(arr, r, v) {
  for(let i = 0; i < r; i++) {
    arr = y; // this array is mutable, as both arr and y reference the same memory address
    arr.splice(i, 0, v);
    arr.pop();
    console.log(`Rotation ${i+1}`, arr);
  }
}
arrayRotation(y, 3, 5)

Answer 14

By utilizing the spread operator, you have the ability to keep the original array unchanged. In the example below, y represents an immutable array:

const y = [1,2,3,4,5];
function arrayRotation(arr, r, v) {
  for(let i = 0; i < r; i++) {
    arr = [...y]; // preserves the immutability of array y [1,2,3,4,5]
    arr.splice(i, 0, v);
    arr.pop();
    console.log(`Rotation ${i+1}`, arr);
  }
}
arrayRotation(y, 3, 5)

If the spread operator isn't used, the y array will be subject to changes with each iteration of the loop.

Below is the result for a mutable array:

const y = [1,2,3,4,5];
function arrayRotation(arr, r, v) {
  for(let i = 0; i < r; i++) {
    arr = y; // this array is mutable, as both arr and y reference the same memory address
    arr.splice(i, 0, v);
    arr.pop();
    console.log(`Rotation ${i+1}`, arr);
  }
}
arrayRotation(y, 3, 5)

Answer 15

Answer №8

Make sure to update the properties in your map function by declaring an empty object instead of relying on the current obj.

Answer 16

Make sure to update the properties in your map function by declaring an empty object instead of relying on the current obj.

Tips for maintaining the immutability of an array containing objects in JavaScript

Answer №1

Answer №2

Answer №3

How can you enforce immutability?

Answer №4

Answer №5

Answer №6

Answer №7

Answer №8

Similar questions

The request to login at the specified API endpoint on localhost:3000 was not successful, resulting in a

Digits disappearing beyond the screen in a JavaScript calculator

JavaScript is limited to functioning within the content area of WordPress websites

Top method for generating a complete object using information from various APIs

How do I find out the properties of individual components in Material UI?

Tips for enabling/disabling a Chrome extension through the utilization of local storage in the background page

What is the best way to convert string dot notation into a nested object structure?

Guide to setting up a new user in Sanity with their profile pictures

Angular DataTable jQuery

What is the reason behind using AJAX to attempt sending a new URL request on

Angular JS - The controller function does not return after executing the service script

Why is it not possible to directly convert the type 'string' to 'System.Collections.Generic.List<int>' in C#?

Regular expression: Find the backslash character that is not being used to escape another character

Discover which npm module includes the lodash dependency

Retrieving the content of input elements within a div post removal

Express.js using GET request to retrieve all data entries from the database

Apollo Client is not properly sending non-server-side rendered requests in conjunction with Next.js

Problem in Swift - Array containing arrays within a dictionary

Tips for retrying an insertion into the database when a duplicate unique value is already present

What is the best way to retrieve the value of a textbox with a dynamic ID?