Let's break it down like this:
Running servers can be costly, but users are willing to contribute processing power through their browsers for free. As a result, server-side code tends to be more expensive compared to client-side code for websites that require multiple servers. However, certain tasks like data validation and retrieval cannot solely rely on client-side execution. While it would be ideal to offload these tasks to the client for quicker response times and reduced server load, security and accessibility considerations necessitate server-side code.
Typically, developers end up implementing both server-side logic and client-side logic. Although server-side code is a must, replicating the same logic in javascript aims to enhance user experience with faster responses and alleviate server workload in specific scenarios, particularly in validation processes where catching errors on the client side can eliminate unnecessary server requests.
However, deploying dual sets of logic poses challenges in development and maintenance, as well as discrepancies between platforms leading to bugs over time.
Introducing server-side javascript as a potential solution to this dilemma. The concept revolves around writing code once to run seamlessly on both server and client, streamlining development, ensuring consistency, and simplifying the language requirements for developers.
Despite the promising advantages, the implementation of server-side javascript faces various obstacles:
- The disparity between server view and client view poses restrictions on direct database access from the browser and DOM manipulation conflicts.
- Differences in client javascript engines contribute to language discrepancies between server and client code.
- The database often remains a significant performance bottleneck, reducing anticipated savings and efficiency gains.
- Limited expertise in javascript among developers affects the effectiveness of server-side javascript implementation.
To address these challenges, solutions like constraining the server-side javascript to a universally supported subset, providing compatible IDEs, establishing guidelines for page structures, and offering standardized javascript libraries have been introduced in tools like Aptana Studio/Jaxer and Node.js.
However, despite these efforts, the complexities and compatibility issues associated with server-side javascript may outweigh the benefits. Ultimately, the cost-effectiveness of additional servers compared to developer time and the preference for more efficient programming languages often prevail.
An alternative approach that may offer a middle ground is the concept of partial server-side javascript. This involves utilizing javascript for request validation on the server side independently, while using a preferred platform for generating response outputs.