I am currently working on an application using three.js, but I am encountering serious performance issues. This particular part of the application is inspired by the Voxel Painter example. In my version, the user initiates placement by clicking on a cell, drags the cursor to the desired end point, and then clicks again to complete the placement.
function onDocumentMouseMove(event) {
//setting up mouse and raycaster
event.preventDefault();
mouse.set((event.clientX / window.innerWidth) * 2 - 1, -(event.clientY / window.innerHeight) * 2 + 1);
raycaster.setFromCamera(mouse, camera);
switch (buildMode) {
case buildModes.CORRIDOR:
scene.add(rollOverFloor);
var intersects = raycaster.intersectObjects(gridObject);
if (intersects.length > 0) {
var intersect = intersects[0];
if (beginPlace == true) {
//storing the intersection position
var endPlace = new THREE.Vector3(0, 0, 0);
endPlace.copy(intersect.point).add(intersect.face.normal);
endPlace.divideScalar(step).floor().multiplyScalar(step).addScalar(step / step);
endPlace.set(endPlace.x, 0, endPlace.z);
corridorDrag(endPlace);
}
else {
//showing temporary wall on the grid
rollOverFloor.position.copy(intersect.point).add(intersect.face.normal);
rollOverFloor.position.divideScalar(step).floor().multiplyScalar(step).addScalar(step / step);
rollOverFloor.position.set(rollOverFloor.position.x, 0, rollOverFloor.position.z);
}
}
break;
}
render();
}
This function is triggered when the user moves the mouse (there are various build modes in the main application, but they are not included here). The function essentially determines the start and end points, with the corridorDrag() function filling in the cells between these points:
function corridorDrag(endPlace) {
deleteFromScene(stateType.CORRIDOR_DRAG);
var startPoint = startPlace;
var endPoint = endPlace;
var zIntersect = new THREE.Vector3(startPoint.x, 0, endPoint.z);
var xIntersect = new THREE.Vector3(endPoint.x, 0, startPoint.z);
var differenceZ = Math.abs(startPlace.z - zIntersect.z);
var differenceX = Math.abs(startPlace.x - xIntersect.x);
var mergedGeometry = new THREE.Geometry();
for (var i = 0; i <= (differenceZ / step); i++) {
for (var j = 0; j <= (differenceX / step); j++) {
var x = startPlace.x;
var y = startPlace.y;
var z = startPlace.z;
//Calculating the position of each cell
if (endPoint.x <= (startPlace.x )) {
if (endPoint.z <= (startPlace.z)) {
x = x - (step * j);
z = z - (step * i);
}
else if (endPoint.z >= (startPlace.z)) {
x = x - (step * j);
z = z + (step * i);
}
} else if (endPoint.x >= (startPlace.x)) {
if (endPoint.z <= (startPlace.z)) {
x = x + (step * j);
z = z - (step * i);
}
else if (endPoint.z >= (startPlace.z)) {
x = x + (step * j);
z = z + (step * i);
}
}
floorGeometry.translate(x, y, z);
mergedGeometry.merge(floorGeometry);
floorGeometry.translate(-x, -y, -z);
}
}
var voxel = new THREE.Mesh(mergedGeometry, tempMaterial);
voxel.state = stateType.CORRIDOR_DRAG;
scene.add(voxel);
tempObjects.push(voxel);
}
Initially, the deleteFromScene() function removes all highlighted cells from the scene (see below). The code should then create multiple meshes based on the start and end points, and add them to the scene.
function deleteFromScene(state) {
tempObjects = [];
var i = scene.children.length;
while (i--) {
if (scene.children[i].state != undefined)
if (scene.children[i].state == state)
scene.children.splice(i, 1);
}
}
Unfortunately, the performance is severely affected and there seems to be a large number of vertices being added to the renderer, as indicated in the WebGLRenderer stats window. I am unsure why it is adding so many vertices, but I suspect this is the cause of the slow rendering.
You can view the application here - the issue can be observed by clicking on a cell, dragging the cursor to the other end of the grid, and noting the time taken to fill in the cells.
Thank you for your help, I am turning to this as a final resort.