Optimal method for linking jQuery ajax requests to transfer data

Question

Optimal method for linking jQuery ajax requests to transfer data

Handling several asynchronous ajax calls in a specific order with information passing between them can be quite challenging. The current approach, even with just three API calls, can be cumbersome. Trying to manage five API calls makes it nearly impossible to organize the error workflow or adjust functions effectively due to limited screen space. Is there a more efficient way to achieve the desired outcome?

/*
 * API Call to get user
 */
$.ajax({
    type: 'POST',
    url: `robin.hood/get_user`,
    data: JSON.stringify({"name":"Joe Dirt"}),
    headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer ' + token},
    datatype: 'json',
    contentType: 'application/json; charset=utf-8',
    success: function (data, text_status, jq_xhr) {
        /*
         * Assume one user is returned only
         */
        let user_id = data;

          // Additional nested AJAX calls and operations...
                    
});

For similar questions:

Chaining multiple jQuery ajax requests
jquery how to use multiple ajax calls one after the end of the other

javascript jquery ajax

Answer 1

Answer №1

When using $.ajax, it returns a Thenable object. This allows you to use the await keyword inside an async function, making it easier to handle and manage compared to using nested callbacks:

async function run() {
  try {
    const user = await $.ajax({
      type: 'POST',
      url: `robin.hood/get_user`,
      data: JSON.stringify({
        "name": "Joe Dirt"
      }),
      headers: {
        Authorization: 'Bearer ' + token
      },
      datatype: 'json',
      contentType: 'application/json; charset=utf-8',
    })

    const balance = await $.ajax({
      // ...
    })

    const data = await $.ajax({
      // ...
    })

    /* STONKS!!! */
  } catch (e) {
    /* NO STONKS */
  }
}
run()

Answer 2

When using $.ajax, it returns a Thenable object. This allows you to use the await keyword inside an async function, making it easier to handle and manage compared to using nested callbacks:

async function run() {
  try {
    const user = await $.ajax({
      type: 'POST',
      url: `robin.hood/get_user`,
      data: JSON.stringify({
        "name": "Joe Dirt"
      }),
      headers: {
        Authorization: 'Bearer ' + token
      },
      datatype: 'json',
      contentType: 'application/json; charset=utf-8',
    })

    const balance = await $.ajax({
      // ...
    })

    const data = await $.ajax({
      // ...
    })

    /* STONKS!!! */
  } catch (e) {
    /* NO STONKS */
  }
}
run()

Optimal method for linking jQuery ajax requests to transfer data

Answer №1

Similar questions

What's preventing me from tapping on hyperlinks on my mobile device?

The JavaScript code is not executing properly within the HTML document

The development server fails to respond when initializing a new project following the NextJs documentation for an empty project

It seems like there is an issue with the res.render function as it is

What steps do I need to take to implement a "single-instance" feature on my ASP.Net AJAX web portal?

Is CDATA insertion automatic in JavaScript within Yii framework?

Limit file selection to images using MUI File Input

Dealing with undefined or null values when using ReactJS with Formik

Utilizing v-model alongside various JavaScript plugins within a single select element

What is the process for displaying all items within an object in Ionic 3?

Tips for dynamically displaying a Material UI dialog with smooth fade effects

Error with Chakra UI and React Hook Form mismatched data types

JSON data displaying improper date format

Node JS Request Params 500 Error

Create a unique shader in Three.js that remains unaffected by the fog effect

The task "gulp js src - duplication and implementation of base" involves duplicating

Encountering a permission error when attempting to upload a file to the public folder on Vercel

Using JavaScript to call an API in PHP and determine how to handle a response that is not equal to 200 by printing an

Execute location.replace when the "control" key is pressed

The error message "Next.js 14 does not recognize res.status as a function"