Issue encountered post minification of AngularJS. Error message: [$injector:unpr] Provider "eProvider" is not recognized: e <- makeErrorsDirective

Question

Issue encountered post minification of AngularJS. Error message: [$injector:unpr] Provider "eProvider" is not recognized: e <- makeErrorsDirective

After using Gulp to minify all my js files, I encountered the following error:

[$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: eProvider <- e <- makeErrorsDirective.

Within my controller file, I had a custom directive.

var myhubdashboardControllers = angular.module('vpdashboardmodule', []);

.directive('mhDashboard', function ($http, authService, apiService) {
    return {
        restrict: 'EA',
        scope: {
            name: '@',
            dash: '@',
            report: '@',
            disname: '@',
            disdesc: '@',
            distot: '@'
        },
        templateUrl: 'views/dashboard/dashboard-direc.html',
        link: function (scope, element, attr) {
            scope.linkChk = scope.name;
            switch (scope.linkChk) {
                case 'Shipped This Week':
                    scope.url = 'erp/JobShipmentList/PostCpsVwShipmentCount';
                    scope.shipstatus = "Departure";
                    scope.period = "ThisWeek";
                    scope.basicfilter = "Open";
                    scope.linkName = "Shipments";
                    scope.linkDesc = "Shipped This Week";
                    break;

}) };

This snippet represents the code utilized in my application.

javascript angularjs minify bundling-and-minification gulp-minify

Answer 1

Answer №1

It is essential to inject services and controllers in a string array for a specific reason.

If you wish to inject scope into a controller, the correct method is:

angular.module('yourApp')
    .controller('yourController',['$scope',function($scope){
    }]);

Failure to use this array of strings while injecting services or controllers can lead to issues during minification:

 angular.module('yourApp')
    .controller('yourController',function(e){
    });

This kind of improper injection can result in errors as Angular won't recognize what 'e' signifies. Remember that the order of injections is crucial.

.directive('mhDashboard', ['$http','authService','apiService', function ($http, authService, apiService) {
    return {
        restrict: 'EA',
        scope: {
            name: '@',
            dash: '@',
            report: '@',
            disname: '@',
            disdesc: '@',
            distot: '@'
        },
        templateUrl: 'views/dashboard/dashboard-direc.html',
        link: function (scope, element, attr) {
            scope.linkChk = scope.name;
            switch (scope.linkChk) {
                case 'Shipped This Week':
                    scope.url = 'erp/JobShipmentList/PostCpsVwShipmentCount';
                    scope.shipstatus = "Departure";
                    scope.period = "ThisWeek";
                    scope.basicfilter = "Open";
                    scope.linkName = "Shipments";
                    scope.linkDesc = "Shipped This Week";
                    break;
}
}])

Answer 2

It is essential to inject services and controllers in a string array for a specific reason.

If you wish to inject scope into a controller, the correct method is:

angular.module('yourApp')
    .controller('yourController',['$scope',function($scope){
    }]);

Failure to use this array of strings while injecting services or controllers can lead to issues during minification:

 angular.module('yourApp')
    .controller('yourController',function(e){
    });

This kind of improper injection can result in errors as Angular won't recognize what 'e' signifies. Remember that the order of injections is crucial.

.directive('mhDashboard', ['$http','authService','apiService', function ($http, authService, apiService) {
    return {
        restrict: 'EA',
        scope: {
            name: '@',
            dash: '@',
            report: '@',
            disname: '@',
            disdesc: '@',
            distot: '@'
        },
        templateUrl: 'views/dashboard/dashboard-direc.html',
        link: function (scope, element, attr) {
            scope.linkChk = scope.name;
            switch (scope.linkChk) {
                case 'Shipped This Week':
                    scope.url = 'erp/JobShipmentList/PostCpsVwShipmentCount';
                    scope.shipstatus = "Departure";
                    scope.period = "ThisWeek";
                    scope.basicfilter = "Open";
                    scope.linkName = "Shipments";
                    scope.linkDesc = "Shipped This Week";
                    break;
}
}])

Answer 3

Answer №2

Minification can cause issues with Angular.

For example, if you write this:

angular.controller("MyCtrl", function ($scope) {...});

During minification, $scope could be changed to something random.

To avoid this, you can do the following:

angular.controller("MyCtrl", ["$scope", function (s) {...}]);

It doesn't matter what you name the argument in the function (like s), as long as it is referenced as "$scope".

For more information, check out: https://docs.angularjs.org/tutorial/step_05#a-note-on-minification

If you need further assistance, please provide the specific code in question, not just the error message.

Answer 4

Minification can cause issues with Angular.

For example, if you write this:

angular.controller("MyCtrl", function ($scope) {...});

During minification, $scope could be changed to something random.

To avoid this, you can do the following:

angular.controller("MyCtrl", ["$scope", function (s) {...}]);

It doesn't matter what you name the argument in the function (like s), as long as it is referenced as "$scope".

For more information, check out: https://docs.angularjs.org/tutorial/step_05#a-note-on-minification

If you need further assistance, please provide the specific code in question, not just the error message.

Answer 5

Answer №3

Dealing with the same issue, I encountered it even after implementing gulp-ng-annotate. The problem specifically arises when using $stateProvider and ngDialog resolves:

$stateProvider
  .state('orders', {
    url: '/orders',
    templateUrl: 'templates/orders.html',
    controller: 'OrdersController as vm',
    resolve: {
      authenticate: function (Auth) {
        return Auth.getAuthResolve();
      }
    }
  });

In order to solve this, the resolve section should be structured like this:

resolve: {
  authenticate: ['Auth', function (Auth) {
    return Auth.getAuthResolve();
  }]
}

It appears that ng-annotate fails to inject the array into resolves, only working for controller/service/factory constructors.

Answer 6

Dealing with the same issue, I encountered it even after implementing gulp-ng-annotate. The problem specifically arises when using $stateProvider and ngDialog resolves:

$stateProvider
  .state('orders', {
    url: '/orders',
    templateUrl: 'templates/orders.html',
    controller: 'OrdersController as vm',
    resolve: {
      authenticate: function (Auth) {
        return Auth.getAuthResolve();
      }
    }
  });

In order to solve this, the resolve section should be structured like this:

resolve: {
  authenticate: ['Auth', function (Auth) {
    return Auth.getAuthResolve();
  }]
}

It appears that ng-annotate fails to inject the array into resolves, only working for controller/service/factory constructors.

Answer 7

Answer №4

Encountered an issue with the utilization of angular-ui-router-title. Here's how I resolved it:

$titleProvider.documentTitle(function($rootScope) {
    return $rootScope.$title + ' my title';
});

was modified to

$titleProvider.documentTitle(['$rootScope', function($rootScope) {
    return $rootScope.$title + ' my title';
}]);

and successfully eliminated the error.

Answer 8

Encountered an issue with the utilization of angular-ui-router-title. Here's how I resolved it:

$titleProvider.documentTitle(function($rootScope) {
    return $rootScope.$title + ' my title';
});

was modified to

$titleProvider.documentTitle(['$rootScope', function($rootScope) {
    return $rootScope.$title + ' my title';
}]);

and successfully eliminated the error.

Issue encountered post minification of AngularJS. Error message: [$injector:unpr] Provider "eProvider" is not recognized: e <- makeErrorsDirective

Answer №1

Answer №2

Answer №3

Answer №4

Similar questions

How come Bootstrap displays dual tabs simultaneously?

Ways to determine the count of arrays within a JSON data structure

What is the best way to receive a user's input date in Dynamics 365 using HTML/JavaScript?

Exploring the capabilities of JSON.stringify in Internet Explorer 11

`Execute onClick function for submit button only when all the required input fields have been populated`

The HTTP post method is mistakenly perceived as the HTTP get method

extract specific data from JSON using JavaScript

Logging out of Google when refreshing the page

Personalized Element Commands and features

Change the format of the modelValue to align with the viewValue within an Angular directive

An unexpected issue occurred: Unable to invoke method on NPObject

The Gatsby plugin image is encountering an error due to a property that it cannot read, specifically 'startsWith

Evaluate easy Ajax- Success Function

Not waiting for all HTTP calls to finish before returning the service

Change the order of ng-repeat in object containing numerical keys

Achieve horizontal wrapping of div elements

To concatenate an array into a single line, you can use the JSON.stringify() method

Prevent any delay between two video segments

A dynamic star rating plugin in jQuery that allows for partial star ratings

discord.js issue: Unable to access attributes of an object that is undefined (specifically 'client')