Is this example showcasing the use of JavaScript closures?

Question

Is this example showcasing the use of JavaScript closures?

I have a JavaScript query that may be geared towards beginners:

var countries = [
    "Bangladesh", "Germany", "Pakistan"];


function checkExistence(arr, input) {

    for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
        if (arr[i] != input) {
            alert("not exist");
            arr.push(input);
            break;
        } else {
            alert("already exist ");
        }
    }

}

checkExistence(countries, "UK");
checkExistence(countries, "Pakistan");
checkExistence(countries, "UK");

My expectation is that when I call the function again with 'UK', it should display "already exist"; however, this is not the case. I prefer to avoid using "prototype" or defining my own, and am seeking a one-line solution.

Within my code, there is an instance where I need to insert a new value into an array and then check that value in subsequent loops. Unfortunately, I keep adding existing values...

Why does the existing value get added, and why is the condition (arr[i] != input) failing?

Please provide an explanation as to why the above code is not functioning as intended.

javascript arrays closures

Answer 1

Answer №1

It is essential to search through the entire array before concluding that an item doesn't exist within it.

function checkForItem(arr, target) {
    for (var index = 0; index < arr.length; index++) {
        if (arr[index] === target) {
            alert("The item already exists in the array");
            return; // stop the search by returning
        }
    }

    // If we reach this point, no matches were found during the loop.
    arr.push(target);
    alert("The item did not exist previously, but has now been added.");
}

Rather than using the name checkForItem, I would recommend naming your function something like addUniqueItem.

Answer 2

It is essential to search through the entire array before concluding that an item doesn't exist within it.

function checkForItem(arr, target) {
    for (var index = 0; index < arr.length; index++) {
        if (arr[index] === target) {
            alert("The item already exists in the array");
            return; // stop the search by returning
        }
    }

    // If we reach this point, no matches were found during the loop.
    arr.push(target);
    alert("The item did not exist previously, but has now been added.");
}

Rather than using the name checkForItem, I would recommend naming your function something like addUniqueItem.

Answer 3

Answer №2

Give this a shot:

function checkIfExist(arr, value) {
    if (!~arr.indexOf(value)) {
        arr.push(value);
    }
}

EXAMPLE: http://jsfiddle.net/L9NhU/

Keep in mind that Array.indexOf may not be supported on older browsers, so consider using a polyfill or stick to your current iteration method. You can find more information and a polyfill for indexOf at the MDN docs: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/indexOf

Answer 4

Give this a shot:

function checkIfExist(arr, value) {
    if (!~arr.indexOf(value)) {
        arr.push(value);
    }
}

EXAMPLE: http://jsfiddle.net/L9NhU/

Keep in mind that Array.indexOf may not be supported on older browsers, so consider using a polyfill or stick to your current iteration method. You can find more information and a polyfill for indexOf at the MDN docs: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/indexOf

Answer 5

Answer №3

Firstly, it is important to note that this is far from being a form of closure.

In any case, here is the compact solution you requested, based on a modification of Ian's response

function checkExistence(array, item) {
  (!~array.indexOf(item)) && array.push(item);
}

We make use of several key concepts:

Array.indexOf searches for the first occurrence of a specific value in an array and returns its index (starting from zero) if found or -1 if not.
The usage of !~ in this context signifies checking for the value -1. The result of ~x is equivalent to -(x+1), transforming -1 into 0 (false) and all other numbers into non-zero values (true). Introducing ! flips this logic, turning -1 into true and everything else into false.
The && operator evaluates both sides. If the left side is truthy, then the right side is executed, otherwise it is skipped. This is commonly referred to as the "guard operator".

Answer 6

Firstly, it is important to note that this is far from being a form of closure.

In any case, here is the compact solution you requested, based on a modification of Ian's response

function checkExistence(array, item) {
  (!~array.indexOf(item)) && array.push(item);
}

We make use of several key concepts:

Array.indexOf searches for the first occurrence of a specific value in an array and returns its index (starting from zero) if found or -1 if not.
The usage of !~ in this context signifies checking for the value -1. The result of ~x is equivalent to -(x+1), transforming -1 into 0 (false) and all other numbers into non-zero values (true). Introducing ! flips this logic, turning -1 into true and everything else into false.
The && operator evaluates both sides. If the left side is truthy, then the right side is executed, otherwise it is skipped. This is commonly referred to as the "guard operator".

Answer 7

Answer №4

Give this code snippet a shot

var cities = ["new york", "tokyo", "paris"];


function checkCityExistence(arr, input) {
   var isPresent = false;

    for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
        if (arr[i] == input) {
            isPresent = true;
        }         
    }

    if(!isPresent)
    {
        alert("City does not exist in the list");
        arr.push(input);
    }
    else
    {
        alert("City already exists in the list");
    }
}

checkCityExistence(cities, "London");
checkCityExistence(cities, "new york");
checkCityExistence(cities, "London");

Answer 8

Give this code snippet a shot

var cities = ["new york", "tokyo", "paris"];


function checkCityExistence(arr, input) {
   var isPresent = false;

    for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
        if (arr[i] == input) {
            isPresent = true;
        }         
    }

    if(!isPresent)
    {
        alert("City does not exist in the list");
        arr.push(input);
    }
    else
    {
        alert("City already exists in the list");
    }
}

checkCityExistence(cities, "London");
checkCityExistence(cities, "new york");
checkCityExistence(cities, "London");

Answer 9

Answer №5

Here is an alternative solution to consider:

function checkIfExist(array, valueToCheck) {

    for (var j = 0; j < array.length; j++) {
        if (array[j] == valueToCheck) {
            alert("Value already exists in the array.");
            return;
        }
    }

    // If the if statement did not trigger, you will reach this point
    alert("Value does not exist in the array");
    array.push(valueToCheck);
}

Answer 10

Here is an alternative solution to consider:

function checkIfExist(array, valueToCheck) {

    for (var j = 0; j < array.length; j++) {
        if (array[j] == valueToCheck) {
            alert("Value already exists in the array.");
            return;
        }
    }

    // If the if statement did not trigger, you will reach this point
    alert("Value does not exist in the array");
    array.push(valueToCheck);
}

Is this example showcasing the use of JavaScript closures?

Answer №1

Answer №2

Answer №3

Answer №4

Answer №5

Similar questions

When the React application loads, loadingbar.js will be mounted initially. However, as the props or states are updated, the object

Include a stylesheet as a prop when rendering a functional component

Can anyone suggest a solution to troubleshoot this issue with CSS Flexbox and absolute positioning?

The Angular template driven forms are flagging as invalid despite the regExp being a match

When using jQuery each method, it may return an [object Object]

Enhance Your Charts: Learn how to dynamically adjust zoom levels between two timestamps with just a simple form submission

Adding a div with a canvas element is malfunctioning

Is it possible to dynamically load records in real time with the help of PHP and jQuery?

Images that were just added to vite4 and vue3 are not appearing after the build on the production environment

PhantomJS reveals underlying jQuery bug

Guide on parsing JSON data received from the frontend

Styling a <slot> within a child component in Vue.js 3.x: Tips and tricks

Grouping items by a key in Vue and creating a chart to visualize similarities among those keys

Error message: The context object is not iterable. Please note that it must be iterable in order to avoid

Submitting an Ajax form to dual scripts

What is the reason behind obtaining a distinct outcome when logging the properties of an object compared to logging the object itself and checking its properties?

Display a JSON object on a web browser

Generating unique ObjectIDs for each object is crucial before saving documents in Mongoose

Slower CSS rendering as Javascript finishes its tasks

The MVC Controller is unable to retrieve decimal values from an Ajax POST request