Does JavaScript impose boxing?

Question

Does JavaScript impose boxing?

After reading the Coercion Chapter in You Don't Know JS, I learned that in JavaScript, coercion never results in a complex value like an object or an array. The concept of boxing was mentioned, but it wasn't considered true coercion. What sets boxing apart from coercion in JavaScript under the hood? Despite appearing the same on the surface, there must be a distinction.

javascript

Answer 1

Answer №1

Let's explore the concept of boxing in programming.

To clarify, "boxing" involves encapsulating a primitive value within an object. For example, using new Number(42) converts the primitive number 42 into a Number object.

In JavaScript, automatic boxing occurs in specific scenarios:

When a method is applied to a primitive value, like:
```
console.log("testing".toUpperCase());
```
The JavaScript engine temporarily wraps the primitive "testing" in a String object to access methods. Once the operation is complete, the wrapper object is discarded.
Using a primitive as the first argument of Function#call or Function#apply in loose mode results in temporary boxing to define the context within the function call.

The reverse process, known as unboxing, involves extracting the primitive value from its wrapping object.

In the JavaScript specification, boxing is referred to as "conversion," while unboxing can be termed both "conversion" and "coercion." This distinction may not be explicitly defined by the specification authors.

Answer 2

Let's explore the concept of boxing in programming.

To clarify, "boxing" involves encapsulating a primitive value within an object. For example, using new Number(42) converts the primitive number 42 into a Number object.

In JavaScript, automatic boxing occurs in specific scenarios:

When a method is applied to a primitive value, like:
```
console.log("testing".toUpperCase());
```
The JavaScript engine temporarily wraps the primitive "testing" in a String object to access methods. Once the operation is complete, the wrapper object is discarded.
Using a primitive as the first argument of Function#call or Function#apply in loose mode results in temporary boxing to define the context within the function call.

The reverse process, known as unboxing, involves extracting the primitive value from its wrapping object.

In the JavaScript specification, boxing is referred to as "conversion," while unboxing can be termed both "conversion" and "coercion." This distinction may not be explicitly defined by the specification authors.

Answer 3

Answer №2

Boxing and coercion are two distinct concepts that can occur independently, together, or not at all.

Boxing involves encapsulating a primitive value within an object.
Coercion, on the other hand, is akin to interpreting a primitive as a different type.

If you observe boxing converting the type of a given value, it is considered a combination of both conversion and boxing.

For example:

var sp = 'abc';              // string primitive

// boxing
var so = new String( sp );   // string object, created from string primitive

// first conversion and then boxing
var sn = new String( 123 ); // string object, created from a number

// coercion without boxing
var n = '3' - 1;            // number 2

It is uncertain whether the coercion at '3' - 1 is executed by the same part of the JavaScript engine as the conversion at new String( 123 ), but it is plausible to view it this way.

Boxing can be utilized for operations that can only be performed with objects, like:

var s = new String('a');
s.id = 123
// --> String { 0: "a", id: 123, length: 1 }

I have never found the need to explicitly use boxing, only implicitly as seen in examples like "abc".charAt(0).

(opinion:)

In my interpretation, the term coercion underscores the aspect that it occurs implicitly within a context of different types, contrasting with words like casting or conversion. This implies that coercion is always implicit and cannot be consciously performed. Instead, the rules of coercion can be leveraged to enforce a specific type, as demonstrated by examples such as '' + 3 for conversion. Explicit conversions like +'3' or Number('3') are not considered coercion. (The specification lacks a clear differentiation here.)

To summarize in a subjective manner:

Boxing involves encapsulating a primitive value within an object.
Coercion is a process that occurs naturally, not something actively executed.
Conversion can be carried out explicitly or by utilizing boxing or coercion.

Answer 4

Boxing and coercion are two distinct concepts that can occur independently, together, or not at all.

Boxing involves encapsulating a primitive value within an object.
Coercion, on the other hand, is akin to interpreting a primitive as a different type.

If you observe boxing converting the type of a given value, it is considered a combination of both conversion and boxing.

For example:

var sp = 'abc';              // string primitive

// boxing
var so = new String( sp );   // string object, created from string primitive

// first conversion and then boxing
var sn = new String( 123 ); // string object, created from a number

// coercion without boxing
var n = '3' - 1;            // number 2

It is uncertain whether the coercion at '3' - 1 is executed by the same part of the JavaScript engine as the conversion at new String( 123 ), but it is plausible to view it this way.

Boxing can be utilized for operations that can only be performed with objects, like:

var s = new String('a');
s.id = 123
// --> String { 0: "a", id: 123, length: 1 }

I have never found the need to explicitly use boxing, only implicitly as seen in examples like "abc".charAt(0).

(opinion:)

In my interpretation, the term coercion underscores the aspect that it occurs implicitly within a context of different types, contrasting with words like casting or conversion. This implies that coercion is always implicit and cannot be consciously performed. Instead, the rules of coercion can be leveraged to enforce a specific type, as demonstrated by examples such as '' + 3 for conversion. Explicit conversions like +'3' or Number('3') are not considered coercion. (The specification lacks a clear differentiation here.)

To summarize in a subjective manner:

Boxing involves encapsulating a primitive value within an object.
Coercion is a process that occurs naturally, not something actively executed.
Conversion can be carried out explicitly or by utilizing boxing or coercion.

Answer 5

Answer №3

It is T.J. Crowder who provides the accurate response. It is worth noting that in the realm of JavaScript, the term "boxing" is not commonly used and is not explicitly mentioned in the specifications, although it does have presence. The encapsulation of primitives as Objects can be considered a type of boxing, as emphasized by Kyle Simpson in his discussions and writings in the You Don't Know JS series, stating that boxing is a form of implicit coercion.

This misconception contributes to the persistence of the outdated (and incorrect) belief that "everything is an Object in JavaScript." If individuals were educated on the fact that primitives do not inherently function as objects, but can be coerced by the JavaScript engine through boxing, many of these misunderstandings would likely dissipate.

Answer 6

It is T.J. Crowder who provides the accurate response. It is worth noting that in the realm of JavaScript, the term "boxing" is not commonly used and is not explicitly mentioned in the specifications, although it does have presence. The encapsulation of primitives as Objects can be considered a type of boxing, as emphasized by Kyle Simpson in his discussions and writings in the You Don't Know JS series, stating that boxing is a form of implicit coercion.

This misconception contributes to the persistence of the outdated (and incorrect) belief that "everything is an Object in JavaScript." If individuals were educated on the fact that primitives do not inherently function as objects, but can be coerced by the JavaScript engine through boxing, many of these misunderstandings would likely dissipate.

Does JavaScript impose boxing?

Answer №1

Answer №2

(opinion:)

Answer №3

Similar questions

Discovering the properties in an object using a variable name in JavaScript

Tips for eliminating fade effect during hover in networkD3 chart in R

Is there a way for me to retrieve the variables saved within this array in JavaScript (vue.js)?

A guide on incorporating dynamic formControlName functionality into AngularJs2

Adjust the href attribute of a link dynamically using the value input from a text field immediately

Using the Jquery validation plugin for Internet Explorer 9 when the website first loads

How come HTML components are able to immediately access the updated value of useState, even though it operates asynchronously?

The Jquery Object #<Object> does not have the 'getElement' method available

When attempting to call Firebase Functions, ensure that Access-Control-Allow-Origin is set up correctly

Invoke jQuery within a nested context once more in the jQuery method sequence

Tips for showing a value in an input text box

ajax modal form editing

What are the steps to make a counter-clockwise dial with jQuery Knob?

Paginating content without the need for a database

Integrating Braintree with Angular for accepting Android Pay transactions

Creating the x and y coordinates for drawImage in HTML5

Confusion surrounding the purpose of an AngularJS controller function

Warning: Unhandled promise rejection detected

<fieldset> triggering onChange event in React form

Discovering a specific property of an object within an array using Typescript