Firstly, it's important to note that both approaches mentioned in the question are incorrect because they do not utilize the return value of filter
which is a new array with filtered elements. To address this issue, consider using forEach
or for-of
on modern systems. However, it's possible that you are already incorporating this and it just wasn't explicitly stated in your question.
Focusing on your primary inquiry:
The initial method may mistakenly assume an element was not found if it evaluates to a falsy value. Falsy values include 0
, ""
, NaN
, null
, undefined
, and false
. On the other hand, the second approach effectively handles these cases.
Another distinction between the two comparisons is that the first one retrieves the property regardless of its placement in the prototype chain, while the second one only considers properties within the object itself (usually preferable). This distinction becomes significant for properties derived from Object.prototype
like valueOf
.
You could also explore options such as Set
or Map
.