d3js operates effectively after the encoding and decoding of data has been completed

Question

d3js operates effectively after the encoding and decoding of data has been completed

Currently, I'm diving into creating a data visualization using d3js paired with hierarchical layout. The data I am working with has the following structure:

Since I am unable to create links to multiple parents, I have resorted to duplicating nodes for display purposes:

To illustrate my issue, I have set up a fiddle demo:

Using the correct data in my JSON input results in the expected layout (graphic outlined in blue).
However, when I use a loop to parse my JSON input, it leads to a distorted graph (graphic outlined in green).

Here is the loop I utilized to parse the input:

for (i in root[2].Arcs){
  var d = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].D];
  var s = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].S];
  if (!d.children){
    d.children = [];
  }
  d.children.push(s);
}

Although the printed elements in the console appear to be the same, the layout render differs, possibly due to variations in object reference.

One workaround I discovered is to decode and encode my variable:

    var root = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(root));

Following this approach, the script functions correctly. However, if 'root' is a lengthy array, the parsing process becomes time-consuming...

Any insights on why encoding/decoding is necessary to display identical content would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

javascript json d3.js

Answer 1

Answer №1

If you're looking to optimize your code, consider replacing your for loop with the following approach. It may offer better performance. Check out the solution on jsfiddle

traverse(root[1].Nodes[0]);
function traverse(node) {
    for (i in root[2].Arcs) {
        var d = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].D];
        if (node.name === root[2].Arcs[i].D) {
            var s = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].S];
            var sCopy={
                "name": s.name
            }
            traverse(sCopy);
            if (!node.children) {
               node.children = [];
            }
            node.children.push(sCopy);
        }
    }
}

Answer 2

If you're looking to optimize your code, consider replacing your for loop with the following approach. It may offer better performance. Check out the solution on jsfiddle

traverse(root[1].Nodes[0]);
function traverse(node) {
    for (i in root[2].Arcs) {
        var d = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].D];
        if (node.name === root[2].Arcs[i].D) {
            var s = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].S];
            var sCopy={
                "name": s.name
            }
            traverse(sCopy);
            if (!node.children) {
               node.children = [];
            }
            node.children.push(sCopy);
        }
    }
}

Answer 3

Answer №2

If you want to avoid shallow copy when encoding/decoding JSON, it's important to understand the difference between deepcopy and shallowcopy. You can learn more about it by visiting this link: What is the difference between a deep copy and a shallow copy?

Using

var root = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(root));

is an incorrect method to prevent shallow copy. Instead, you can utilize jQuery's clone method or JavaScript's slice method to create a deep copy of a JavaScript array.

For example:

var d=[1,2,3,4,5,6];//create array
var b=d;//copy array into another array (shallow copy/reference copy)
var e=d.slice();//clone array in another variable (deep copy)
d[0]=9; //change array element
console.log(d)// result : [9,2,3,4,5,6] (changed array)
console.log(b)// result : [9,2,3,4,5,6] (changed array due to reference)
console.log(e)// result : [1,2,3,4,5,6] (unchanged array due to deep copy)

Another solution is to use underscore. You can pick the cloning portion from the underscore library without needing the full JavaScript code.

In underscore, you can clone an object array using:

var a = [{f: 1}, {f:5}, {f:10}];
var b = _.map(a, _.clone);       // <----
b[1].f = 55;
console.log(JSON.stringify(a));

It will output:

[{"f":1},{"f":5},{"f":10}]

Answer 4

If you want to avoid shallow copy when encoding/decoding JSON, it's important to understand the difference between deepcopy and shallowcopy. You can learn more about it by visiting this link: What is the difference between a deep copy and a shallow copy?

Using

var root = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(root));

is an incorrect method to prevent shallow copy. Instead, you can utilize jQuery's clone method or JavaScript's slice method to create a deep copy of a JavaScript array.

For example:

var d=[1,2,3,4,5,6];//create array
var b=d;//copy array into another array (shallow copy/reference copy)
var e=d.slice();//clone array in another variable (deep copy)
d[0]=9; //change array element
console.log(d)// result : [9,2,3,4,5,6] (changed array)
console.log(b)// result : [9,2,3,4,5,6] (changed array due to reference)
console.log(e)// result : [1,2,3,4,5,6] (unchanged array due to deep copy)

Another solution is to use underscore. You can pick the cloning portion from the underscore library without needing the full JavaScript code.

In underscore, you can clone an object array using:

var a = [{f: 1}, {f:5}, {f:10}];
var b = _.map(a, _.clone);       // <----
b[1].f = 55;
console.log(JSON.stringify(a));

It will output:

[{"f":1},{"f":5},{"f":10}]

Answer 5

Answer №3

Note: The performance may not be as efficient as the original post, refer to the comments below. This method is designed to be scalable, ensuring it works regardless of the object or flag configurations.

Solution

Here is an alternative approach to the "deep copy" technique suggested by @transcranial and @LaxmikantDange.

I recommend utilizing jQuery (personally, I prefer this approach for its simplicity) and leveraging the extend method:

<<load jquery>>

root = $.extend(true, {}, root[1].Nodes[0]);
graph(root2,svg);
graph(root,svg2);

Ensure that the first argument is set to true as demonstrated in the documentation here or in this discussion regarding efficient deep cloning in JavaScript (top answer).

I cannot confirm the performance implications, but I encourage you to test and share your results with me!

Keep in mind that deep copying might have limitations based on your application (such as broken links). For example, in a recent React project where I shared events between graphs, certain interactions like zoom events were not automatically synchronized due to the separate object instances.

Answer 6

Note: The performance may not be as efficient as the original post, refer to the comments below. This method is designed to be scalable, ensuring it works regardless of the object or flag configurations.

Solution

Here is an alternative approach to the "deep copy" technique suggested by @transcranial and @LaxmikantDange.

I recommend utilizing jQuery (personally, I prefer this approach for its simplicity) and leveraging the extend method:

<<load jquery>>

root = $.extend(true, {}, root[1].Nodes[0]);
graph(root2,svg);
graph(root,svg2);

Ensure that the first argument is set to true as demonstrated in the documentation here or in this discussion regarding efficient deep cloning in JavaScript (top answer).

I cannot confirm the performance implications, but I encourage you to test and share your results with me!

Keep in mind that deep copying might have limitations based on your application (such as broken links). For example, in a recent React project where I shared events between graphs, certain interactions like zoom events were not automatically synchronized due to the separate object instances.

Answer 7

Answer №4

To ensure proper functionality when adding new nodes (which are objects) to your arrays of children nodes, you must deep copy these objects before pushing them into the array. Simply reassigning "=" will not work for objects, as it does for string or number arrays. Deep copying the children nodes before adding them to the array will resolve any layout and rendering issues.

Here is your original code for adding children nodes to the array:

for (i in root[2].Arcs){
  var d = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].D];
  var s = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].S];
  if (!d.children){
    d.children = [];
  }
  d.children.push(s);
}

Updated code:

for (i in root[2].Arcs){
  var d = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].D];
  var s = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].S];
  if (!d.children){
    d.children = [];
  }
  d.children.push(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(s)));
}

Give it a try here: JSFiddle.

Furthermore, it should be noted that d3 hierarchical layouts, including cluster, do not naturally support nodes with multiple parents. In such cases, consider utilizing a force graph layout.

Answer 8

To ensure proper functionality when adding new nodes (which are objects) to your arrays of children nodes, you must deep copy these objects before pushing them into the array. Simply reassigning "=" will not work for objects, as it does for string or number arrays. Deep copying the children nodes before adding them to the array will resolve any layout and rendering issues.

Here is your original code for adding children nodes to the array:

for (i in root[2].Arcs){
  var d = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].D];
  var s = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].S];
  if (!d.children){
    d.children = [];
  }
  d.children.push(s);
}

Updated code:

for (i in root[2].Arcs){
  var d = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].D];
  var s = root[1].Nodes[root[2].Arcs[i].S];
  if (!d.children){
    d.children = [];
  }
  d.children.push(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(s)));
}

Give it a try here: JSFiddle.

Furthermore, it should be noted that d3 hierarchical layouts, including cluster, do not naturally support nodes with multiple parents. In such cases, consider utilizing a force graph layout.

d3js operates effectively after the encoding and decoding of data has been completed

Answer №1

Answer №2

Answer №3

Answer №4

Similar questions

Creating a Vue application without the use of vue-cli and instead running it on an express

Retrieving form output number using JQuery

How to eliminate a particular validator from a form group in Angular

Is it possible to incorporate JavaScript files into a TypeScript (ts, tsx) project that has already been built?

JQuery div not cooperating with other JavaScript/jQuery functions

Error message encountered: "Node.js Object [object Object] does not support the method"

Tips for displaying a view with data fetched from various sources

Iterate over the table data and present it in the form of a Google

Parameter for Ajax URL

Is there a way to send multiple parameters in an array to a route?

The jQuery response appears blank in the browser, despite the fact that it works fine with

"Unraveling nested data structures in React using JSON parsing

What is the procedure for importing material UI components into the main class?

Is the && operator being utilized as a conditional statement?

How can I automatically redirect a React page once I receive a response from Express?

An error was encountered when trying to read property '0' of an undefined object in a for loop

A guide to using jqGrid: Retrieve the value of a particular cell by double clicking on a row

showcasing JSON data in an HTML table with pure JavaScript

Node.js - Passport authentication consistently results in redirection to failure route

Leverage and repurpose OOP objects