Big thanks to @Xan for
directing me to this informative post
that addresses the same issue.
After reviewing the evidence, it seems likely that there is a bug in how
Chrome handles background pages.
In addition, I made some interesting observations:
The post referenced by @Xan suggests a potential bug in Chrome's
background pages.
I conducted a test where I triggered the bug by calling chrome.runtime.reload()
in my
background page's developer console and found that
chrome.runtime.reload()
functioned as expected in my extension's
popup UI.
While background pages are not obsolete yet, the first line of the
documentation
recommends transitioning to event pages instead, indicating that fixing this bug may not be a top priority for the Chromium team. Therefore, it is possible that this issue will be marked as 'wontfix'
, making it unproductive to wait for a solution.
As a result, I have come up with a workaround that should suffice until I can either implement
soft-restart capabilities in my extension OR switch to event pages:
Considering:
Most of my extension's features are activated through a Chrome
browserAction
. Before rendering the browser action, I can send a message to the background page that will prompt an immediate callback.
If the extension starts normally, the fix will simply be unnoticed by the user.
Since the fix does not impact normal operations, it will not interfere if the bug is resolved in a future release by the Chromium team.
"Dead" background pages will lack any message listener registrations. If the background page fails to respond to the safety check message,
the popup can rectify the issue by restarting the extension.
There is a trade-off: if the popup times out waiting for the 'safety
net' message and restarts, the popup UI will abruptly close without warning the end user. While not ideal, I believe this behavior is more preferable than the extension suddenly ceasing to function as it can presently.
Feel free to share your thoughts and ideas!